This question often brings people into sendatonia at the airtime, because they have never thought about how to positively influence their own emotions. After a minute, they arrive with practical proposals. A student could draw on his or her experience in preparing for a major exam: „Don`t get involved in last-minute cramming.” Others have suggested meditation to put aside distracted thoughts. Some people suggest listening to music in advance. What you choose should depend on the emotional state you want to reach. If you tend to be reserved or not strong enough for yourself, The Rocky theme might inflate you. If others tell you that you are sometimes too strong, „Moonlight” might be a better choice. Russell makes a similar point. He thinks the best way to study emotions is to measure their components — facial expressions and activation of the nervous system, behavior and inner emotions. But he says it`s too far from bringing all these things together and calling the result „emotions.” „We draw some clusters of them and we call them,” he says.

„When your physiology is high, you are in danger, and your face goes down an alley, you say, „Oh, that`s fear. I think that as scientists, we will not define clusters well. They`re too vague. Better, he says, „only ask: Under what conditions do the facial muscles tighten in a certain way?” instead of saying that contraction signals an emotion. When mesquita looks at Ekman`s photos, she says, „I don`t realize that what these faces are expressing is an emotion. But it is undeniable that what they express is relevant to emotions. I think a lot of these problems are not so much in the data as in the conclusions of these data. The message is clear. Being an effective manager, a high-performing team member or a competent negotiator requires adapting to one`s own emotions and the ability to positively refer to the emotions of others. This insight has fuelled much of the work in the field of emotional intelligence. The concept was new 15 years ago, but it is now known, thanks in part to psychologist Daniel Goleman.

His popular books on the subject relied heavily on research conducted by Peter Salovey of Yale and John D. Mayer of the University of New Hampshire, and built on their definition of emotional intelligence as „the ability to monitor, discriminate, discriminate and use this information to direct their own thinking and action.” In particular, emotionally intelligent people have the ability to do so: according to Ekman, the evidence of universality is „statistically strong and robust.” In a meta-analysis of similar photo-matching experiences, people across cultures were able to correctly classify emotional expressions on average 58 percent of the time – more for some emotions, weaker for others.